For defoamer compounders and for coatings, paper, textile, construction-chemical and water-treatment customers who need foam control. Hydrophobic and high-absorption silica materials support system stability, liquid powdering and powder-defoamer screening.

A hydrophobic route for oil-based defoamer systems, and two high-absorption powder routes aimed at liquid powdering and powder-system stability. Mineral oil, silicone oil, polyether and waterborne systems each need their own compatibility testing.
We publish the selection logic, not the numbers. Data sheets are issued per enquiry so the figures match the current supplier revision and your application.
Typical values for orientation only, not a specification. The current supplier technical data sheet governs for quotation, COA and customer testing — request it for the grade you are evaluating.
| Test dimension | What to watch | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| Knock-down speed | How fast foam is eliminated | Tells you immediate defoaming power |
| Persistence | Foam regrowth over time | Tells you sustained stability |
| Compatibility | Fit with resin, emulsion, oil or water phase | Avoids separation, surface oil and cratering |
| Liquid powdering | Whether the powder still flows after absorption | Tells you if powdering is feasible |
| Storage stability | Settling, caking or loss of activity over time | Tells you product reliability |
Confirm whether the customer runs mineral oil, silicone oil, polyether or a waterborne system first, then decide between the hydrophobic route of CENSIL 17 and the high-absorption powdering route of CENSIL 698 / 688.
Liquid vitamins and choline that will not stay a free-flowing powder; premix caking in store.
Seasoning and beverage powders bridging in the hopper or setting hard on the shelf.
Paste that separates, thins or loses its structure between batches.
The material you use now, the formulation or resin, the equipment and the target you need to hit. That is enough for us to say whether we have something worth testing.